RETHINKING GEOMETRY
Dynamic
Elementary ^ Geometry
Dr. James M. Parks
SUNY - Potsdam
parksjm@potsdam.edu
THE CASE FOR DYNAMIC GEOMETRY
With the introduction of computers and creative software, the
pedagogy in the field of mathematics is undergoing many changes. However,
with programs like Dynamic Geometry, the aim is not to abandon the methods of
deduction and proof, but rather to enlarge the audience, so that more students
can share in the sense of the nature of what it is ‘to do mathematics’.
The van Hiele_s levels of geometric thinking:
1. Visualization
2. Descriptive/Analytic
3. Abstract/Relational (Informal Deduction)
4. Formal Deduction
5. Rigor/Metamathematical
A main goal of Dynamic Geometry (like GSP:Geometer_s Sketchpad,
Cabri Geometry II, & The Geometry Inventor) is:
_...to bring students through the first three levels,
encouraging a process of discovery that more closely reflects how
mathematics is usually invented: A mathematician first visualizes and
analyzes a problem, making conjectures before attempting a proof.*
In other words, empower the user with the tools to produce
geometric constructions, manipulate figures, observe patterns (visualize),
develop conjectures & informal proofs, and build/discover
counter-examples. This allows the user to gain understanding and
conviction BEFORE they attempt proof!
HOW TO USE DYNAMIC GEOMETRY
GSP lists three ways which it can be used to teach geometry*:
_ Investigations: Build &
manipulate specific
constructions/figures to study some
particular property (makes use of the
dynamic aspect of GSP).
_ Explorations: Open-ended experimentation
(uses all
aspects of GSP).
_ Demonstrations/Presentations: Can vary from
classroom ‘lectures’
to ‘visua’ proofs.
Specific GSP applications/tools:
_ Drawing
_ Constructions
_ Transformations
_ Measurements & calculations
_ Tracing
_ Animation
_ Recording (Scripts)
Method of use of GSP in the course:
Geometry Topics
GSP Application(s)
_Finite
Geometries
_Drawing (intro. to GSP)
_Euclidean
Geometry
_Constructions
_Non-Euclidean
_Poincaré & sphere models
Geometries
_Transformation
_Transformations
Geometry
RESULTS
As is usually the case, the results of a change in pedagogy
such as this do not immediately appear in the exams and other means of
assessment. I have noticed a slight increase in the gpa, and I have
noticed an increase in the amount of time available to cover some topics, that
is the use of GPS seems to speed up the presentation of certain parts of the
course.
The students do appear to have more interest and enthusiasm for
geometry, and they seem to have a better grasp of certain parts of the course
(like Non-Euclidean geometry).
THE FACILITY
The campus facility at Potsdam where I teach the course is a
combination computer lab and presentation room. It is split into two
parts: one half has 12 PowerPC Macs on individual tables arranged in a ‘U’ with
seating for 30, and a projection system (which includes computer, video, laser
disc, and electronic overhead projection); the other half is a free-form area
with tables and chairs for 30, a white board, and the same projection
system. The entire room is networked and has a laser printer on
line. We also have a site license for GSP, so the program is available on
all computers on campus.
* ‘Teaching Geometry with The Geometer’s Sketchpad’, Teaching Notes, Key Curr.
Press, 1995.
REFERENCES
1. GSP: Key Curr. Press, POBox 2304, Berkeley CA 94702,
800-338-7638, <http://www.keypress.com/>.
2. Cabri Geometry II: Texas Instruments, Dallas TX,
<http//www.ti.com/calc/docs/cabri.htm>.
3. Dynamic Geometry Home Page:
<http://www.edc.org/LTT/DG/index.html>.
4. Geometry Turned On Home Page:
<http://forum.swarthmore.edu/dynamic/geometry_turned_on/>.
5. The Geometer_s Sketchpad Home Page:
<http://forum.swarthmore.edu/sketchpad/sketchpad.html>.