(subfile 41: calculating axis
angles)
Imagine the 2-dimensional version. Knowing the coordinates of two
points allows the calculation of the distance between them, and knowing
the coordinates of one point and the distance between, one can specify
a locus on which the other point must be found.
|
| a
|
|
|
|
b
|
------------------------------------
Now assume that the numerical coordinates of a and b are fixed and
known, and that we know the distance between the points. If the same
pair of coordinate values must be retained, but the distance between
them is known to be decreasing (because conversational input
tells us that they are more closely related than we thought), then
the angle between the two axes must decrease also. It’s not possible to
solve this concisely without knowing one other fact, such as the angle
between the line ab and one of the axes, but that is not important for
MS calculations, which involve fuzzy quantities and imprecise
magnitudes to start with. Moving the axes away from orthogonality
simply means that there will be
a component of motion along one axis
when there is change along the other, unlike the situation with
right-angle axes. This is sufficient to deal with the types of
resonance & vibration I have so far found to be necessary. It is
also sufficient to establish that two axes are identical – a situation
likely to occur once the program begins creating new axes of its own. (See
Appendix V.
Axis arithmetic, for the actual functions that allow
these calculations to be made.)
As an example, suppose we have characterized Republicans and Democrats
along all the axes of policy that exist. The values along these axes
are known. No change in attitude towards the philosophy of human
organizations/government can change the values. We can be sure (or, for
the sake of this example, we assert that we are sure) that a Democrat
will always favor the right to unionize, regardless of what wisdom
about political science has surfaced recently.
Then suppose some brilliant aliens have arrived on Earth and explained
to us, once and for all, everything that can ever be known about
political science, and suppose that this wisdom tells us that there is
in fact much less functional, meaningful difference between the two
groups we have defined, than we had previously thought. This
constitutes a new bit of knowledge that would require a reduction in
distance between points a and b, requiring a reconfiguration of the
axes such that the newly understood distance could be accommodated
while retaining the values on all the individual axes.