Underage Drinking Enforcement Training Center
by David J. Hanson, Ph.D.
The Underage Drinking Enforcement Training Center is funded by American taxpayers who have a right to expect it to produce accurate and unbiased publications. Unfortunately, the Center uses its tax-supported budget to produce a continuing deluge of highly biased and misleading publications, presentations and communications
A recent example illustrates the problem. In an issue of Resource Alert, the Center reports on two studies. One is a study of American teenagers that found parents strongly influence their children‘s drinking decisions. That’s not a surprising finding because it’s consistent with many other studies. What is surprising is the Center’s biased and misleading report of the study.
The Center’s report implies that parents who served their children alcohol caused them to binge drink. The Center ignored the important fact that teenagers who reported drinking alcohol with their parents were less likely than others to have either consumed alcohol or abused it in recent weeks! 1
Drinking alcohol with parents “may help teach them responsible drinking habits or extinguish some of the ‘novelty’ or ‘excitement’ of drinking” according to senior researcher Dr. Kristie Long Foley of the School of Medicine at Wake Forest University. Dr. Foley describes drinking with parents as a “protective” behavior. 2
All of that was completely missing from the Center’s clearly biased and misleading report of the research and its implications. The Center betrays the trust of the American taxpayer.
The finding that drinking with parents is a protective behavior is not surprising. Those societies and cultural groups with very high rates of drinking but very low rates of alcohol-related problems have certain common keys to success. One such protective key is that in such groups young people learn about moderate drinking from their parents and they do so from an early age.
But don’t expect to ever hear any of these facts from the Underage Drinking Enforcement Training Center because they conflict with its predetermined ideology.
In reporting in the second study, the Center clearly implies that drinking at an earlier age causes later drinking problems in adulthood. It completely ignores the caution made by the lead investigator of the study, who emphasized that “the finding of higher and significant correlations between age at first drink and lifetime drinking issues probably reflects the operation of a variety of variables contributing to problems drinking, rather than a direct causal relationship between the age at first drink and later problems.” In other words, the lead investigator warns against the conclusion that the Center chose to present.
The National Institute on Alcohol abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA) has also emphasized that such correlations don’t demonstrate causality. That’s because so much evidence indicates that individuals with certain personality characteristics, such as sensation seeking, are more likely to experience drinking problems. But they’re also more likely to drink at an early age, engage in risky sex, drive recklessly, gamble, and sky dive.
In the words of the federal NIAAA,
It is not clear whether starting to drink at an early age actually causes alcoholism or whether it simply indicates an existing vulnerability to alcohol use disorders. For example, both early drinking and alcoholism have been linked to personality characteristics such as strong tendencies to act impulsively and to seek out new experiences and sensations. Some evidence indicates that genetic factorsmay contribute to the relationship between early drinking and subsequent alcoholism. 3 For more see endnote #3 in Readings and References.
Recent research has found that
problems seen in adulthood among early drinkers existed prior to their taking that first drink, which suggests that developmental processes were already disrupted prior to that first drink. Thus, an early AFD (age at first drink)is more likely a 'symptom' of an underlying vulnerability of disinhibitory processes rather than a 'cause' of increased rates of alcoholism. 4
So preventing early consumption of alcohol would probably not have any impact on later drinking behaviors. But that’s exactly what the Underage Drinking Enforcement Training Center implies, ignoring federal government cautions to the contrary.
Although undesirable, such bias and distortion is permissible on the part of private activist organizations. However, it is totally unacceptable by a federally funded agency. If truth in advertising applied, the organization would have to be re-named the Underage Drinking Enforcement Indoctrination Center.
filed under: [pending]